The struggle for power is perpetual as well as universal. The unipolarity that was assumed by the commentators after the fall of former USSR can’t stay for a long time. The history never allows a hyperpower to last long. In near or far future there must be the emergence of some new challenges and the globe would return to its multi power and multi-polar nature.
Now if we consider the case of US hegemony, there are many people who don’t like the US hegemony. But the utter and harsh reality is that the world’s experience without any power hegemony is not at all a charming one to be glad about. If we consider the case where there are many powers that fight for monopolization of the global power then we can say that better is the situation that is characterized by the absence hegemony of power. (Ferguson, 2004)
The US hegemony plays a crucial role in politics related to world peace. The US has announced to generate and nurture a pleasant and peaceful global order characterized by the proper establishment of democracy and the freedom of voice and the freedom to elect. This country has pronounced the oath to secure global harmony and a stable global system. One of the major objectives of this country is to unleash a combat against terrorism and tyranny in the form of autocracy. In this context, we can remember President Bush (senior). He said “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order—a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful—and we will be—we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.” . .